DyingChurch.com recently wrote a post called “The Writing on the Wall, describing how pastors are stepping down from their positions and moving out of the church, taking their ministry to the streets.
Although not all Christians will agree me with, I think that it’s a great idea. Churches with large numbers have the ongoing problem of maintaining interaction with the members on a personal basis. Despite the fact that my own church isn’t that large, I do feel unnoticed at times, albeit mainly due to my insecurity. And as the church grows, it only gets harder to cope with the loneliness.
Pastors are now leaving the church and holding “house churches” - small, intimate places, where believers get to know each other much more personally. As far as I know, this is the “emerging church” movement that has been taking place across the world in the past few years.
Proclaiming the gospel from street corners and going door-to-door are methods that just don’t seem to work very effectively in the developed world. Nowadays, people are too closed to strangers, and for good reason. There are too many hidden agendas to consider when confronting a stranger - “Is he trying to get me into his car?”, “Does he have a knife behind his back?”, “Why does their religion make them do this?”, etc. The most effective method of evangelism is for Christians to take their actions seriously and to live a Christ-like life. (Side note: I need to remind myself of this more often.) Interest is piqued when people see the difference in a Christian’s life and the conversion process begins there.
Bringing a person to church can be very difficult, even if they have some interest in Christianity. There’s just something about going to church that seems so foreign and intimidating to many of those who don’t regularly attend. For example, I know that if I were to go to a Buddhist temple, I’d feel apprehensive about what I should or shouldn’t do, whether there are Buddhist-only rituals that I should abstain from, etc. But if I went for coffee with a trusted Buddhist friend and asked him questions about his faith, I’d feel much more comfortable and relaxed. In the same way, to some people, dropping by a small “house church” where a few friends meet together, can be less intimidating than a huge service.
In any event, a pastor at the pulpit is limited with respect to his reach into the world. That’s why the church needs to meet people in their own environment, instead of waiting for the people to come to church.
At the same time, it’s not like I believe that the conventional church should be abolished or that it is no longer applicable. It has its place and remains an important part of Christianity. Conventional churches with an emphasis on small groups can be very similar to the aforementioned, but I’d love to see home churches, like those in 100 A.D., become more prominent in this postmodern world.
However, I’m still open to debate about this issue, so feel free to attack my argument if you like. 